tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13376296.post115175583455984058..comments2023-05-22T04:15:04.606-04:00Comments on Old Doxoblogy: Luke 17:20-37Jeremy Weaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02552780649310262425noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13376296.post-1152482812747887122006-07-09T18:06:00.000-04:002006-07-09T18:06:00.000-04:00One fine piece of work. The Kingdom is both presen...One fine piece of work. The Kingdom is both present and future.mark piersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13882538938829765324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13376296.post-1151839627169346622006-07-02T07:27:00.000-04:002006-07-02T07:27:00.000-04:00Speaking for myself, I have often hindered my own ...Speaking for myself, I have often hindered my own understanding and interpretation of scripture by having too much of an either/or attitude. Examples: The kingdom is either visible or it's invisible. Or the kingdom is either present or it is future. Or you are either regenerated or you are reformed.<BR/>All these can be understood in a more balanced and scriptural way by allowing a both/and option in our interpretation of scripture. Applying this to these examples would look like this: The kingdom is both visible and invisible. It is both present and future. We are both regenerated and reformed( by reformed I mean reformation of character).<BR/>I realize that I may be restating some of what you've already said, but I gotta do something with my time.Garry Weaverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03576501820657549682noreply@blogger.com